Click here to go to another website where these papers can be read.
Nowadays, among people who are interested in being spiritual, there is often an attitude that intellectuality and being concerned with intellectual matters interferes with being spiritual. Sometimes that is obviously true: if you have a divine intuition or an insistent deep feeling telling you to do something that seems impractical, your practical mind, influenced by the modern scientific paradigm, may insist you ignore your intuition. In order to be receptive to their intuitions, feelings and other spiritual things, many modern people turn against intellectuality and their mind.
That often leads many modern spiritual people to see Western culture as dominated purely by scientific secular thinking while romanticizing Indian and Chinese culture as being more spiritual and intuitive.
I [Joseph Waligore] was not able to do this as my first exposure to spirituality came from Socrates and Plato and I knew how absolutely central they were to Western philosophy. I also knew that the Neoplatonic philosophy tradition was the dominant cultural paradigm in the Renaissance. I wondered if the spiritual paradigm was so great, why was it not kept in the West? An individual’s worldview often changes for good reasons, so I thought that I should treat Western culture as like an individual and think about what good reasons it had for dropping a spiritual paradigm. If this paradigm was so wonderful and adequate for all purposes, then it seemed obvious Western culture would never have dropped this spiritual paradigm.
This attitude led me into a much deeper studying of the Western spiritual philosophy tradition. I found this tradition to be much more richer and interesting than modern spiritual people or modern scholars think it is. [I should also point out that I have extensive knowledge of Indian and Chinese philosophy. I teach a course every term on Asian philosophy in the University of Wisconsin system, wrote my dissertation partly on Indian philosophy, and can read Chinese very well.]
These papers and manuscripts are academic writings. That means they are tightly focused on the topic, heavily footnoted and assume basic prior knowledge of the subject and its importance in the history of ideas. These writings are not meant to be an introduction to any of these topics. Some of these papers were presented at academic settings, one was my Ph. D. dissertation, and the ones on Socrates were written for graduate school courses.
Socrates is often considered the founder of Western philosophy. He was known for questioning everything and using his reason to analyze everything. He also got divine voices and unquestioning followed them. The Socrates section has three papers written about his voices and the relationship of them to his skepticism and his use of reason.
Some important Greek philosophers traveled with Alexander the Great’s army to India and were very impressed by Indian monks. A major question in Hellenistic philosophy is how much these philosophers were influenced by Indian philosophy. One paper argues that Hellenistic ethics and skepticism was tremendously influenced by Buddhist and Jain monks.
The Stoics and other Hellenistic philosophers thought the sage, a wise person who was following God’s will, would always be perfectly happy no matter what external things happened to him. These philosophers said the sage would be totally happy even if tortured. I wrote my Ph. D. dissertation on these ideas. I also investigated whether the Greek philosophers were influenced by Indian philosophers who had a similar idea. Bringing modern ideas of pain research and happiness and meditation, I argued the Hellenistic philosophers were right in thinking the sage would always be happy even if tortured.
The last time a spiritually-oriented non-Christian philosophy dominated Western culture was in the Renaissance. This philosophy “Hermeticism” believed in many things now popular among New Agers. This paper looks at the transition from Hermeticism to the experimental scientific method of Francis Bacon. It explores the contributions of Hermeticism to Bacon’s scientific method and the modifications Bacon made to that tradition and the reasons why he modified the tradition. This paper shows some of the limitations of spiritual philosophy and why Western culture rejected it for a different paradigm.
The Enlightenment is usually considered the Age of Reason and the first major development of a scientific secular worldview. This is a misconception. The Enlightenment is better seen as a rebellion against a Christian conception of an unfair tyrannical God who had the right to treat people however he wanted to. The Enlightenment thinkers were very spiritual people with a God who was very involved in the world and in their lives. The Enlightenment thinkers said God dispensed his loving care to people not through the Catholic Church (as the Catholics thought) or through the Christian Bible (as the Protestants thought) but through Nature. All the ideas usually associated with the Enlightenment science, equality, criticism, worldliness derive from their prior view of God and God’s providential care for people through Nature. This section has a paper on how the significant majority of British Deists believed in miracles. It also has a paper on how the vast majority of Enlightenment thinkers believed in miracles. It also has a manuscript on the Enlightenment’s real spirituality which is based on a new conception of God which emphasized his fairness and benevolence, unlike previous Christians who mostly emphasized God’s sovereignty and power.
The New Age movement is usually seen as the Age of Aquarius, a paradigm shift or the return of Theosophy or Spiritualism. This long manuscript argues that it is best viewed as a cultural movement like the Enlightenment and Romanticism and shows how many New Age ideas are based on the ideas of these two movements.
Modern Western philosophy in the last one hundred years has been dominated in the Anglo-Saxon world by analytical philosophy. Analytical philosophy emphasizes logic, critical thinking and having a firm grasp on what a person is talking about. Placing this movement in its historical context helps one to understand why it so vehemently rejects any talk of spirituality. This paper argues that there can be no place for spirituality in the analytical philosophy tradition as long as empiricism is seen as being based purely on sensory experience. Once, however, experience is opened up to include other kinds of non-sensory experience such as experience of divine messages or intuitions, then there can be a philosophy based on spiritual empiricism that also values logic, critical thinking and having a firm grasp on what you are talking about.
Click here to go to another website where these academic papers can be read.
Copyrighted 2009
This essay was written by Joseph Waligore. He dedicated his life to following the will of the Universe when he was 20. Seven months later he received a message from his Higher Self or inner connection to the divine to quit Dartmouth College. Through following a deep intuition in a dream and after many synchronistic experiences, he met his soulmate and married her. He and his wife followed their spiritual intuitions in their daily lives, including receiving messages to have children. For twelve years he stayed at home and raised his three children while his wife worked. Then, his wife told him he needed to make some money, so he got a Ph. D. in philosophy from Syracuse University. He currently has a part-time job teaching philosophy and religious studies at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. More information about him can be found at his MySpace profile. He also has a website with information about his own spiritual journey and his spiritual philosophy.
There is a Facebook group called Flowing. People interested in meeting other people who are interested in these ideas and/or participating in discussions about these ideas are invited to join the group.
Many people reach this site through keyword advertisements. It might be of interest that Joseph got the money for these ads through his daytrading profits.
jos markojosss
Hello – I must say, I’m impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and information was very easy to access. I found what I wanted in no time at all. Pretty awesome. Would appreciate it if you add forums or something, it would be a perfect way for your clients to interact. Great job
This blog is great. How did you come up witht he idea?
Heard about this site from my friend. He pointed me here and told me I’d find what I need. He was right! I got all the questions I had, answered. Didn’t even take long to find it. Love the fact that you made it so easy for people like me. More power
Hiya, nice day.. Your article is extremely impressive. I never considered that it was feasible to accomplish something like that until after I looked over your post. You certainly gave a great perception on exactly how this whole process works. I will make sure to return for more advice. Thanks
Pingback: Home Page | Following The Flow